I think that while the revolts would have occurred with or
without social media outlets, the existence of these outlets shaped the Arab
revolts of 2011 and made them more successful. I think Khondker’s idea of “cyber-civil
society” is one of the best examples of how social media influenced the
revolts. Since creating strong civil society groups is one of the main factors
we’ve explored in creating a successful revolution, it is important to note
that social media cites make organization and the spread of information much
easier and more widely accessible. It has the ability to take unstructured grassroots
organizations and give them a means of operation. They can explicitly state
their goal and spread their message to a wider range of people, which, in the
end, is the main goal of any organization: to reach and gain the support of as
many people as possible. Just the
ability to spread information quickly and to many people has changed the way
revolts occur. The images of Khaled Said being beaten to death in Egypt sparked
angry and shock which resulted in more organization. Events that spark
widespread shock or anger can now be used to organize a more structured
uprising. The want and need for revolution is present, but the use of Facebook
and Twitter to further these goals makes the revolts much more powerful and successful.
No comments:
Post a Comment